Carlos Wotzkow, Castro’s agent?
Open letter to readers of Guaracabuya
By Servando González
Copyright © 2007 by Servando González. All All rights reserved.
(Note to readers: At the beginning of this article I will use as sources a few personal e-mails, but in the rest mainly I will cite articles from sources that are from the domain public and easily verifiable. My comments appear in square brackets [ ] )
I imagine that the readers of Guaracabuya are aware of my recent polemic with Carlos Wotzkow. The controversy began when Wotzkow wrote a virulent article (“Religious fundamentalism? by Servando González) in which he bitterly criticized me because of an article I had written about Darwinism and evolution, in which he did not mention it neither directly nor indirectly. In his article, Wotzkow me repeatedly accuses him of being a religious fundamentalist and, in addition, He makes a veiled death threat to me: “This world would be a much better place without the fanaticism you profess.” In a second article entitled “Servando González: Archbishop of Mazorra“, Wotzkow increases plus the level of his expletives, and accuses me of being crazy and of homosexual.
The first thing that jumps out at you in this controversy is that Wotzkow’s reaction has been a thousand times greater than what that justified the initial fact.
But, to understand this complicated matter a little better, there is to start at the beginning. Therefore, I copy below our exchange of e-mails, prior to publication from my article “Darwinism’s Green Box” (a review from Michael J. Behe’s book, Darwin’s Black Box), beginning with whom I was kind enough to send him enclosing the aforementioned article before sending it to Guaracabuya for publication, until the last one, which he sent me before publishing your first article. (Because of its importance, which I will point out later, I have emphasized in bold some of the texts in Wotzkow’s e-mails. The texts between
From: Carlos Wotzkow
To: Servando Gonzalez
Subject: RE: On Darwinism and Evolution
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 08:36:38 +0200Servando,
I read your text about Darwin. I do not agree or by 1%, but it’s logical if you notice that you don’t understand no evolution. The schema of the virus is a representation of these organisms and is nothing more than a schema simplistic, to put it as they really are, you would believe that it is an abstract work of a schizophrenic illuminated. But anyway, what do you want, me to comment on your article? Would you publish it?
Affectionate greetings
Carlos
———-
From: Servando Gonzalez
To: Carlos Wotzkow
Subject: RE: On Darwinism and Evolution
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:55:27 -0700 (PDT)Carlos:
Write your review of the article and publish it yourself on my blog, at the end of the article, where it says Comments. <http://truthlies.blog.truthlies.tv/>
In the meantime, send me a photo taken under a microscope A bacteriophage virus, let’s see if you convince me that it actually looks like “an abstract work by a schizophrenic illuminated.”
A hug.
Servando.
———-
From: Carlos Wotzkow
To: Servando Gonzalez
Subject: Evolution and Genocide
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:16:24 +0200Servando,
I will distribute the article as usual, to everyone my contacts. The problem I see is not convincing you You’re welcome, because you can tell that you have an incurable suspicion against it of evolution in general. The problem is that you call genocide, fascists and other things to all those who believe in the evolution, when you know that it is the religious, the “intelligent design” included, those who have made and they are making crusades against science, against the people and of the lives of others.
You know that I have considered you, personally and also publicly, a source of reference regarding the Cuban politics. On this subject, with a thousand apologies, I don’t You haven’t even earned my respect, so you can imagine how easy it will be to desacralize all your arguments, but wait, I’ll respond to your text with the same impetus that you have attacked Darwin
Best regards
Carlos
PD. I attach the lysoformative representation of a simple viruis, as we use it, not to kill people, or to work with the oil companies (let’s finish!), but to block its multiplier effects and heal. Between others, to people who get sick with slight infections of the Airways. I think Servando, you’ve gotten in in a field where you don’t even know a dad. And it’s a shame!
———-
From: Servando Gonzalez
To: Carlos Wotzkow
Subject: Re: Evolution and Genocide
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 08:10:03 -0700 (PDT)Dear Carlos,
Logical positivists say that when two people they don’t agree is because they use the same word to denote two different things, or use two words to denote the same thing. In other words, for them the origin of all the disagreements is purely semantic.
I agree with them, as long as the two people who have disagreements are honest people. Therefore I have no doubt that, deep down, our disagreements do not they are — they cannot be — greater.
But don’t lose sight of the fact that my article — I clarify it All right — it’s not written from a scientific point of view, but from the perspective of intelligence and espionage. The objective of my article was not so much to discredit the message, but to the messengers.
For example, in the case of religion, although I consider myself and I try to live according to ethical principles of Christianity, I have the worst opinion of the churches, in particular of the Catholic Church.
As for the fact that it is noticeable that I have an incurable suspicion in against evolution in general, it is evident. Never I have believed that life on this planet evolved from inanimate matter. I don’t think the changes climate change that we are experiencing across the planet — global warming — are due to humans drive SUVs or fart too much.
So, to begin with, it would be good for you to start your answer clarifying without a doubt that, contrary to to me, you believe in evolution.
And I stop right here, so as not to burn the arguments of my counter-answer (unless your answer is so forceful that you convince me of my mistake and I have to stick my tongue in my the delicate one).
Look, so that everyone wins, I’m going to send you my article to Miguel to distribute it in Guaracabuya. When you have your answer, you also send it to Miguel, and thus the controversy will be productive for Everybody. Tell me if you agree.
And, please, even if the subject is very serious, let’s not lose sense of humor, that life is too short to spend it all the time. One of the things that always made me has fucked with the politically correct (who here in the U.S. are the greatest believers in evolution) it’s their lack of sense of humor.
A hug,
Servando.
From: Carlos Wotzkow
To: Servando Gonzalez
Subject: My Advice
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:14:17 +0200Dear Servando,
Twice you announced to me that you were about to attack the Darwinism with I don’t know what political conspiracies. Twice I recommended you, as your friend, to turn the cannons against global environmentalism. Now in this message I get the impression that you confuse them. That would be worse than believing in Fidel Castro’s honesty!!!
The e-mail that I enclose is part of my daily records, because everything is recorded in case the memo is needed later. In He’ll see that he didn’t want you to jump in against something that I respect because I work with it and because I know it’s one of the most honest and clear branches that science has.
But anyway, my advice now would be to do “delete” to that crazy article you have written and so on. I will now finish mine, which will be unique, but so devastating that I won’t need to answer your “counter-answer”. Basing your comments on Michael J. Behe, who is the discrediting Homo pocatus is, at the very least, throwing you a shovelful of discredit analytical on top.
All this, without going into the nonsense you talk about evolution and its political conspiracies. Cunt Servando, reflect: do you think you were informed correctly? Did you expect me to applaud such a crude text? I don’t I consider your enemy, but don’t consider me an imbecile Well, if you do so, the one who disrespects it is you.
I respect your God and your Christianity, but you don’t ask me to to honor them. I’ll leave that to you. The day that I study religion goes and I give it an important position on my scale of values. That’s why you, who haven’t studied anything of evolution, you should at least respect it and not say that evolutionary biologists are a handful of unscrupulous liars. Where do you want to go?
Yes, Michael will receive a copy of my text as the whenever I distribute my texts and if you want to Mediator, well, ok. But be careful, I’m not going to throw my text without attaching yours, that wouldn’t be smart on my part, for you have given me by the vein of taste playing one of my favorite professional topics and you have given me the opportunity to show off.
A hug
Carlos
——–
From: Carlos Wotzkow” <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
[E-mail sent to your subscriber list]
Subject: Article for publication
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:16:48 +0200Dear all,
The text of this article contains all the links and the clarifications that allow us to understand its existence. This text however, it should not be published in www.servandogonzalez.com I do not authorize any text of mine to appear in that website.
With affection
Carlos
——–
As can be seen, until June 19, 2007, the exchange between us he had been respectful and cordial. However the e-mails that Wotzkow sent me on the 19th and the June 21 mark a drastic change in tone and content. In Wotzkow’s first article (“Fundamentalism religious? by Servando González”), which he attached to his e-mail of June 21, the vituperations, threats, and insults, reach a level of virulence never reached in any of its previous articles — which are characterized by for its vituperative, high-sounding and obscene language. When you read it The question that came to my mind, and that may have happened in the minds of the readers, it was, What fly did he Stung? Later I will analyze the true reasons that I believe Wotzkow had for doing so.
Carlos Wotzkow, admirer of the articles by Servando González
One of my first contacts with Carlos Wotzkow — whom so much I have only met through the Internet, never personally –, It was a clash. My article “The Stranger Jesús Díaz’s encounter with death” had was published in early April 2002 on the CubaNuestraDigital website, directed by Carlos Estefanía. A few days later My article generated a response laden with expletives — but without refuting any of my points — on Elizabeth’s part Burgos, and shortly afterwards Estefanía withdrew my article on their website.
Elizabeth Burgos is a Venezuelan Marxist who received military training in Cuba before starting their activities guerrillas in Latin America. Burgos married Regis Debray when he was serving his sentence in a Bolivian prison for his complicity with Che Guevara.
When I saw that Estefanía had withdrawn my article After I had published it, I refuted him with a article that I titled “Cuba Nuestra joins Castro’s censorship.” This article generated a hard-fought controversy between those who attacked me and those who defended me.
Among those who attacked me for my article was Carlos Wotzkow. As usual, Wotzkow did not refute any of the the points expressed in my article. The only argument that he argued was that, “I would not write against a dead man, which I did not have the courage to tell him in life.”
I am not going to discuss here the fallacy of this reasoning. Suffice to say that, for example, if we were to abide by that principle, Humberto Fontova would not have been able to publish his book on Che Guevara. But, now I don’t remember when or how, Wotzkow apparently changed his mind, communicated with me, and that’s where our e-mail exchange began and ideas.
Anyone who has read the two articles in those who reproach me will have come to the conclusion that Wotzkow has always had a very bad opinion about me personally and intellectually. But their own words seem to deny it. I copy below a series of articles where he mentions me, and I ask readers to draw your own conclusions:
“My friends know that part of my Swiss family He works in circles close to the police European Intelligence and Ballistics Research of the military industry. I never talk to any of them of their daily professional chores, because with the beans they don’t play and they don’t like dominoes. Instead, I have had the privilege and honor of being able to listen in one of these family gatherings (full of linked guests) to intelligence) to a friend who, intrigued in turn by my origin and entry into this family, accepted gather information and skim a little about Cuba before to accept to be part of a colloquium.”
“That clear and believe us, — I’ve been told Before we end our long conversation –, those Quixotic articles from your friend that you have recommended to me reading*, are the most balanced and rational thing I’ve ever seen among all the material from Cuba that we have reviewed throughout this month.”
*Refers to three articles by the exiled Servando González entitled: Fidel Castro Supermole // The Strange Encounter of Jesús Díaz with death // Fidel Epiphany. All taken from the Guaracabuya Magazine.
(Carlos Wotzkow, “La Cuba de mañana: una mirada Helvetica”, October 2, 2004)
——
“Dear friends,
I recommend reading Servando’s article to everyone González against the absurd protagonism that is given to him in Miami he gives one of Castro’s ex-henchmen. [“Former Assistant de Castro reveals nothing new.”]
One of the most ridiculous stories ever heard to this gentleman is that of Castro’s burning of his underwear. Servando eloquently mocks the narrator and I, one of the fools who believe history.
A hug and read calmly to Servando González, one of the least stupid Cubans I’ve ever had the privilege of to know.
Fuck Servando, why did you leave Switzerland? No we would have had a wonderful time with a Fondue in front of us!”
(Carlos Wotzkow, “Recommended Reading”)
——
From: Carlos Wotzkow” <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
[E-mail sent to your subscriber list]
Subject: Don’t stop reading and listening
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 19:36:13 +0200Dear Friends,
I don’t know if you’ve noticed that in the last few months, after the thunders in the Miami Herald, this newspaper has become a newspaper that serves some to do justice to Castro’s “martyrs” which the regime itself has forgotten. However, the data by Anabelle Rodríguez that are poured into the article “Humbolt 7 and the man who betrayed my father” show me once again that the death of Jesus Díaz was not natural. If you read the fantastic article by Servando González on the subject and see the modus operandi described in this text by the herald [El Nuevo Herald], for you can imagine the real result of the autopsy.
But if you want more, that is, if you want to vomit copiously, go to the Cuba Our of Princess Stephanie of Sweden and look at the interview that the Stalinist has done with the “beautiful” Rodríguez. http://www.cubanuestra.nu/web/article.asp?artID=3330
With affection
Carlos
JesúsDíaz and the magazine Encuentro of Cuban Culture
To understand well what I am going to expose next, I suggest to readers who have not read my article “The strange Encounter of Jesús Díaz with death”, that they stop here and read it before to continue. (The article has been censored in the pages of Guaracabuya — that is what I will refer to later –, but you can read it in < http://www.cubanet.org/opi/05150201.htm>) For readers who have already read it, and for those who haven’t Have time to read it right now, I’ll recap briefly what it is about.
According to what I explained in that article, the magazine Encuentro de la Cultura Cubana, directed by Jesús Díaz until his death, has been since its foundation A key element of a psychological warfare operation of the Castro intelligence services. The main objective of that operation is,
“The political neutralization of intellectuals and non-Castro Cuban artists, both in exile and in Cuba, through the creation of what in intelligence It is known as an ‘agent of influence’. Although the term ‘agent of influence’ usually applies to people, too can be applied to organizations of all kinds, including media of mass communication.”
“Operation Encounter was planned around in 1990, and shortly thereafter entered the operational phase with the sending [abroad] of intellectuals pro-Castro “exiled” Cubans whose goal was to infiltrating Cuban communities in exile, mainly in Mexico, Spain and the United States. It’s not coincidence that, from that moment on, a group of intellectuals identified with Castroism, Jesús Díaz between They have taken the path of “exile” by surprise. Its internationalist mission was to penetrate and confuse ideologically to the Cuban intellectuals in exile true.”
“I am not going to mention in this work the names of others intellectuals involved in this operation; There will be time for it. Suffice it to say that every Cuban intellectual who has taken the path of exile after 1990, and that in too short a time has reached prominent positions in the field of culture or art in the country that makes it welcomed, is suspicious.”
In my article I did not mention the names of the intellectuals I mean, but then someone did it for me: Carlos Wotzkow. In the infinity of articles he has written in the last five years, Wotzkow has mentioned them repeatedly by name and accused of being agents of influence of Castroism. According to Wotzkow, they are: Carlos Estefanía, Raúl Rojas, Iván de la Nuez, Raúl Rivero and Alejandro Armengol. Although Wotzkow does not mention it, to this list we should add the most notable of all: Jesus Díaz.
Although I consider that, in one way or another, some of these individuals they effectively act as subtle agents of influence of Castroism, this does not mean that I think that everyone does it consciously and much less that everyone is an agent of intelligence Castro. Most of them were trained in Cuba post-Castro, and we must not forget that the ruling class not only wins, but also convinces. In addition Intelligence officers know well that the best agent is the one who does not know, or does not want to know, that he has been recruited.
Undoubtedly, “The Strange Encounter of Jesus Díaz with death” is a work that has done him damage to intelligence subversive plans and activities Castroist against exile. Although it was censored in several websites, some people managed to read it and recommended it to them to his friends. A short time later, the writer César Leante touched on the theme of Encuentro, and dedicated it to a complete chapter of his book El largo brazo de Castro. In his book Leante uses my article as his main source of information.
Leante is not an isolated case. In his article “Jesus Díaz, Comme Ci Comme Ça”, Esteban Casañas Lostal says that,
“Driven perhaps by curiosity about the allegations that always weighed on Jesús Díaz as an agent undercover of the Castro regime, I was rummaging through the Internet in search of some information, and I think the most important material on that controversial person is the article written by Servando González titled; ‘The strange encounter of Jesús Díaz with death'”
I wrote this article four years ago and, although it has generated some personal attacks, so far no one has tried to refute it. Jorge A. Pomar, a Cuban blogger resident in Germany, acknowledges this in a recent article “The Meeting Place within the Spectrum of Exile”, in which he states that “The editors of Encuentro en la Red have never refuted Servando’s serious accusations González and César Leante.”
Who really is Carlos Wotzkow?
The saying circulates among intelligence officers that, “For the military, the first time is a coincidence, the second time coincidence, and the third, enemy action. On the contrary, For intelligence officers there are no coincidences or Coincidences. For them, the first time is already an action of the enemy.” The surprising thing is that they rarely get it wrong.
And, according to what he himself affirms in several of his articles, in the life of Carlos Wotzkow there are too many Coincidences. Some of them really difficult to explain. See:
1. According to data provided by himself in his biography who appears in Guaracabuya, Wotzkow is an ornithologist who in 1982 refused to participate in a project secret that consisted of creating transmissible viruses and using migratory birds to introduce them into the United States in germ warfare attacks. Because it is refused to continue participating in the project, Wotzkow was declared an “untrustworthy person,” and the Department of State Security initiated a file against him and kept under surveillance. For this and other reasons, Wotzkow decided He left the island, and now lives in exile in Switzerland. ( Carlos Wotzkow and J.A. Kemp “ICBMs in Cuba: Today’s Threat” 2002)
In another article, Wotzkow explains how, during the two years he worked on that secret project, personally watched Cuban scientists work in the process of creating viruses. When some of scientists realized the true objectives of their investigation, refused to continue working on the investigations, and this led to his expulsion. Because of this, Wilfredo Torres, President of the Academy of Sciences of Cuba, conceived the creation of the Law Special 501, which declared these scientists “enemies of the state,” and replaced them with military workers.
The centre in question to which Wotzkow refers is part of the of the so-called “biological front”. Elsewhere of this article, Wotzkow explains that his experience first hand occurred at the Institute of Zoology, where he worked from December 1979 to March 1979. 1982 when he was expelled. (“West Nile Virus: Bioweapon or Divine Punishment?” by Carlos Wotzkow, Miguel A. Faria, Jr., M.D., Agustin Blazquez and Jaums Sutton, Nov. 22, 2002)
In another article, Wotzkow recounts that, “In 1980 Dr. Fernando González traveled to New York and to Washington together with Mr. Hiram González and the Noel González. These three individuals, who have nothing to do with of triplets, except for their identical hatred (widely declared and confirmed by his employment) against the American people, came back to Zoology teaching many Photos. They had been in the most prestigious institutions. prestigious of world science (the guest spy to search one’s own house) and they would return other times. Do you have any questions? Well, I’m sorry. Three more months later, construction began in the Atabey neighborhood on Biological Front and 10 months later, they came out through the roof (they were expelled) 25 unreliable researchers politically to swell the lists of the already disproportionate unemployment.” (Carlos Wotzkow, “Cría Castros and the crows will kill you.”)
Aunque las referencias que hace Wotzkow son algo contradictorias, se infiere que, si no en el proyecto central, al menos trabajó por año y medio en actividades periféricas relacionadas con una operación castrista de guerra bacteriológica. Dadas las características supersecretas de tal proyecto, es lógico pensar que los participantes en el mismo hayan sido personas de total confianza del régimen y que, además, hayan sido sometidas a un riguroso chequeo de sus vidas, incluyendo su pasado, su familia, sus amigos, etc. Es difícil de explicar cómo Wotzkow, que luego demostró no ser confiable para el régimen, pudo escurrirse a través de tan fino tamiz y logró trabajar en el proyecto, aunque haya sido en su periferia.
2. After being expelled from the Institute, Wotzkow makes, in his own words, “two instructive visits to the dungeons of Villa Marista” [General Headquarters of the Political Police of the Regime]. (Carlos Wotzkow, Abbreviated Biography, Guaracabuya). Or that is, he is arrested, taken to the police headquarters Castro’s politics, staying for several days in one of the dungeons of that center, and interrogated repeatedly times.
It is well known the psychological pressures that are exerted against opponents in Cuba, and these pressures they increase when they are detained in the dungeons of State security. Wotzkow himself recounts, perhaps, based on my own experience, such as,
“in Villa Marista, Cuban prisoners seem to have no names and unfortunately, although it may seem absurd to you, neither they are called by a number. There they fulfill a chain “The Worm” (perhaps a dissident of the latter generation), “the sell-out of the homeland” (a poor rafter failed), “the chicken” (one who cried for the rigged trial) “the coca grower” (one who at the apparently refused to join the Shining Path), “the mandarria” (a madman whom the prison authorities used as a rapist according to boredom and levels of sadism) and many others more forgotten.” (Carlos Wotzkow, “The Stereotype Is Also to Blame.”)
“Imagine that you have been imprisoned in Cuba for having disagreements with the government (according to my sources, more than 42% of detainees leave the second day and swear to the interrogation instructor that the only thing they wanted was to earn the pyre for Mayami.”) . . . “Imagine that you are one of the Hard prisoners. One of the most co-occurring that Cuba has given. ¡Without As a discussion, Maceo was a flea next to him! Well What do you do when the MININT officer puts her teenage daughter in front of a huge black man with the erect member and says: “For now she only He sees it, but if you don’t cooperate, then even you will feel it”? What do you do? Do you cooperate, or do you let Your daughter was raped by an energetic, who may be someone else prisoner, who perhaps is not aware of what he is doing, and that maybe he is sick with AIDS and will never will pay for his actions?” (Carlos Wotzkow, “Attention: to the diaspora.”)
To the above it could well be added, “Imagine that you have been imprisoned in Cuba for having disagreements with the government, and after being raped in one of the cells of Villa Marista by one of those madmen, they show him the video in which everything has been recorded for posterity. What would you do? Would you cooperate with them in all that they command him or he would refuse, and he would leave to show the video to their family and friends?”
3. Wotzkow decides to learn to pilot, and his flight instructor is René González Sehwerert, intelligence officer Castro, who years later is imprisoned in the U.S. as part of the “Wasp Network” and now complies conviction for espionage in a U.S. prison.
“From:”Carlos Wotzkow” <[email protected]>
To:[email protected]
[E-mail sent to your subscriber list]
Subject: More matches (see photos)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:13:10 +0100Dear all,
In fact, Miguel Cossio seems to be the son of the HP cultural attaché of the Mexican Embassy. The Communists they take Miami. But today I bring you something else. According to a Statement by a CIA agent, the spy convict René González, former instructor of piloting of this servant of yours, it is not only spy, but bastard son of Fidel Castro.” . . “I shared many hours of flight and conversation with René and I can assure you that the resemblance goes even further than what vaguely observed in these two photographs.
With affection.
Carlos Wotzkow.
According to the details that appeared in the trial, González Sehwerert (alias Castor), was a U.S. citizen who specialized in compiling data that it sent to the services of Castro’s intelligence on the particularities and Activities of anti-Castro political groups in exile.
It is difficult to explain how Carlos Wotzkow, a “untrustworthy” person who is later declared an “enemy” of the state” by the regime, and that he has been interrogated in Villa Marista, the headquarters of Castro’s security, manages to establish contact and maintain friendly relationships with a Castro intelligence officer to take lessons from flight. According to his own confession, during his training Wotzkow has long conversations with René González.
It is good to remember that the work of every intelligence officer It is not from 9 to 5 from Monday to Friday, but 24/7. That is, the intelligence officers are always on duty. No there are records of those conversations to which he refers Wotzkow, and the cockpit of a small plane is a Ideal place to chat with absolute privacy. In addition Airplane pilot is a very useful skill for a spy in the event that, in an emergency, he has than to quickly leave the country in which it operates.
As an interesting fact, it is good to clarify that Wotzkow had never mentioned his personal relations with González Sehweret until after he was arrested.
4. In one of his articles, Wotzkow tells of his departure from Cuba:
“Just two days after my release from Villa Marista, a mulatto who worked for the Security of the State, he told me, in the gloomy 070 office of the airport international José Martí, ‘that if I didn’t behave and did not alert them to the interests of the gringos who worked with me, they made up the most implausible, made it graphically credible, and they fucked up my life.'”
“I had already been asked in Villa Marista before about the whereabouts of my Ranger uniform, because a guy that he had become a sports pilot, a diver, and had mountaineering knowledge could not work with Americans looking at birds. At least one apprentice spy it had to be.” (Carlos Wotzkow, “Propaganda Castro: mode of use”)
In this article Wotzkow adds two new abilities to that of pilot: diver and mountaineer, which apparently he learned after being declared an “enemy of the state”. The most interesting is that of a mountaineer. Training in mountaineering techniques in Cuba, where the mountain more rugged can be climbed on the back of a donkey, it has no a lot of logic, so mountaineers in Cuba are not abundant. But mountaineering can be a very useful skill for an agent whose mission requires him to reside in a country surrounded by mountains, whose Air Force maintains strict control of the airspace — for example, Switzerland.
5. Carlos Wotzkow leaves the country in 1992 and settles in Switzerland. Shortly afterwards he married a citizen of that country whose family “develops in circles close to the federal police, European intelligence and ballistics research of the military industry.” (Carlos Wotzkow “The Cuba of tomorrow: a Swiss gaze” , October 2, 2004.)
The fact that, among so many Swiss women, she has given the extraordinary chance that a newcomer to the country establishes relationships and then marry a woman whose family is close to the Federal Police, European Intelligence and Investigation ballistics of the Swiss military industry, it’s a coincidence so great, that it managed to arouse one’s curiosity of the friends of his spouse’s relatives. Like Wotzkow himself explains, “intrigued in turn by its origin and entry in this family,” this retired intelligence officer Switzerland asked him a few questions on the subject. (Carlos Wotzkow “The Cuba of tomorrow: a Swiss gaze”, October 2, 2004.) Intelligence officers are people very suspicious.
In “The Strange Encounter of Jesus Diaz with death,” he affirmed that every Cuban intellectual who has taken the path of exile after 1990, and that in too short a time has reached prominent positions in the field of culture or art in the country that welcomed, is suspicious.
Wotzkow took the path of exile in 1992, the same the year in which his friend Jesús Díaz did it and, in his own words, shortly after he works at an important university. Plus, it’s not easy explain how someone who knows of the existence of a super-secret germ warfare project of such a nature, that he refused to continue working in and that, for that reason, he was declared an enemy of the state and is closely monitored by the political police Castro, is authorized to legally emigrate from the country.
Unlike exiles such as Dr. Emilio (Millo) Ochoa, former senator and signatory of the 1940 Constitution, which he had to work for many years as a taxi driver in Miami, Wotzkow belongs to the generation of the so-called “exile” of velvet”, who entered exile through the door big. Wotzkow never had to work as a taxi driver, nor did he have to apply for I work in a post office. Shortly after arriving in Switzerland he begins to work at a University.
“Of my merits at the University of Bern I do not I have to give proof to Servando González. There I earn my beans in an extremely competitive world and dynamic to which Servando González he could never enter.” (Carlos Wotzkow, “Servando González: Archbishop of Mazorra.”)
As we shall see later, after having established in Switzerland as a Cuban exile, Wotzkow continues to maintain relations with members of Castro’s intelligence outside and within the island.
6. While residing as an exile in Switzerland, Wotzkow maintains friendly relations with Jesús Díaz, an exile Cuban who is suspected of having been an official or at least close collaborator of Castro’s intelligence. “Jesus Díaz once explained to me on the phone the reasons why he did not accept Servando’s texts, which I was begging him insistently to publish something.” (Carlos Wotzkow, “Servando González: Archbishop of Mazorra”)
According to his own confession, Wotzkow also maintains contact with Castro intelligence officers residents in Cuba:
7. “Dear friends, The work that I enclose is dedicated to to Castro’s environmentalism. I owe it to the information of my good friends Agustín Blázquez and Graça Salgueiro, as well as people linked to [Castro’s] intelligence. Please post and distribute as you like.” (Carlos Wotzkow” [email protected], To: [email protected] [E-mail sent to your subscriber list], Subject: For publish, article drunk, Date:Sat, 21 Apr 2007 15:08:09)
8. Another contact: “The author has just (apparently) re-establish contact with a member of the MININT of his or her family. intimate trust. After two years of Silently, this graduate in military counterintelligence has again showing signs of dissatisfaction with the system that pays him. The reason for the contact in this case has been the see my name in a memo that is currently “circulating” in its area of operation.
“The “report” mentions the “Wotzkow Manual” to end Castro”, published by the “Opposition” (digital magazine of Puerto Rico). Since its publication on November 5, 2005, 321 records (in 4 provinces) of the political police they mention of the aforementioned “manual”. Some 1,622 shares of civil disobedience occurring after the above date “could” be linked to it.” (Carlos Wotzkow, “MININT: 100% Reliable?”)
9. Another one:
“The sebaceous is authentic, as when he asked Raúl Castro to authorize him to carry a gun because he had so many enemies that he couldn’t or sleep,! Raúl Rivero with a Makarov 9mm (No. 138 908 on the right side and manufactured in the Izhmek Izhevsky Mekhanichesky Zavod, according to it is recorded in documents controlled at my request).” (Carlos Wotzkow, “The Sadness of Raúl Rivero”)
Where are those documents, “controlled” at your request, and who sent you that information Wotzkow? It is obvious that the documents are in Cuba, in the files of MININT, and only members of that organization they may have sent the information to Wotzkow.
10. Other:
“Imagine that you have been imprisoned in Cuba for having disagreements with the government (according to My sources, more than 42% of detainees crack on the second day and they swear to the interrogation instructor that the only thing they wanted was to earn the pyre for Mayami.” (Carlos Wotzkow, “Attention: to the diaspora.”)
Obviously, the sources Wotzkow is referring to are members active in the Ministry of the Interior or Castro’s Intelligence.
11. Another contact:
“I, Carlos Wotzkow, offer the sum of 10,000 dollars to the Cuban agent to provide me with a list of the more than 82,000 names of regular informants of the MININT. To those who think I’m stupid, just the clarification to assure you that I already have more than 2,000 names verifiable.” (Carlos Wotzkow, “Public Offering to Castro’s henchmen.”)
As the only ones who have access to these lists are Minint officers, the only way for Wotzkow has obtained 2,000 verifiable names of informants than to have been through one or more officers of the MINIT itself.
12. More contacts:
“Look, at this moment in Cuba there are members of the MININT who risk their lives sending information into exile. Those, have 100 times more co and damage capacity to the regime, than those who whine so much in their communiqués. At this very moment, there are members of the intelligence Cuban (not ex-dissidents who cry because they can’t get paid a check on the Western Union) who trust more in me, than in those renowned and good panelists manners of TV Martí.” (Carlos Wotzkow, “Attention: to the diaspora.”)
It is difficult to explain how active officers of the MININT can trust a supposedly anti-Castro exile.
13. Another one:
“A trustworthy source [at the G2] just confirmed to me that ‘the Ladies in White is a group under security control and ten minutes after they make a decision the G2 is already aware. Blanca (Reyes) is directed Like a puppet with strings from an office in the department 9 that is based in Madrid'”. (Carlos Wotzkow, “Attention: to the diaspora”)
¿Cómo se explica que un ornitólogo que fue declarado enemigo del estado castrista mantenga tantas relaciones amistosas con miembros de la DGI y el MININT? El sólo hecho de que haya tantos miembros de la inteligencia castrista que confían en Wotzkow, es razón más que suficiente para no confiar en él.
Cui bono
En el curso de esta polémica se me ha acusado de muchas cosas. Entre ellas, la peor — no por el hecho en sí mismo, sino por la importancia que algunos le han dado — es la de haber alterado maliciosamente una foto de Wozkow que apareció publicada en mi sitio web www.servandogonzalez.org, hecho que he negado rotundamente desde el principio
La primera noticia de que una foto en mi sitio web había sido alterada me la dio Miguel Uría en una llamada telefónica, en la que me preguntó si había leído el último artículo de Wotzkow. Recuerdo que le respondí que no, y que no pensaba hacerlo. Uría me respondió que debía hacerlo, pues Wotzkow me acusaba de algo muy grave: que yo había alterado una foto suya que aparecía en mi artículo “¿Evolución en la revolución?”
At first I confess that I did not understand what he meant Uría. In the article in question on my site three illustrations appear: the photo of the bottle that is says it contained a homunculus, a photo of the cover of the book with the SRI report, and a photo of the page website of the University of Bern, where the information is available about Wotzkow. But, after hastily reading the article, I found out that Wotzkow was referring to to your photo. However, when I checked the As it appeared on my website at the time, I checked that the photo was the same one I had posted, which it did not present any alteration.
The fact that someone altered a photo on my website I couldn’t see it until much later, when I received a fax from a reader in Guaracabuya who, by pure chance, I had printed the article as it appeared at a certain point on my website. Obviously the photo was altered. It could rather be said that it was slightly caricatured. Caricaturization consists in the fact that the Wotzkow’s mouth appears slightly more open and his teeth slightly larger. And I emphasize the word “lightly,” because people who have not seen the original photo hardly they would notice that it has been altered.
The original facsimile is part of a screen shot (that is, a faithful copy) of the page with the information of Wotzkow as it appears on the University’s website of Bern. All I did was reduce it proportionately, to fit on my article page. Considered It is necessary to include the facsimile of the page, since it is a document that proves that Wotzkow is not a biologist, and much less a molecular biologist, as he claims to be, but just a “research assistant/technician” from the Cardiovascular Research Center. My goal was to show that, since Wozkow is not a biologist, and my criticisms in the article on Behe’s book focused on the evolutionary biologists, Wotzkow had no reason some to take them as a personal offense.
In the article in which he responds to my statement that he is not a biologist, Wotzkow tries to deny it in his style characteristic; with a personal attack: “Then the madman searches all over the Internet about my professional quality. Find a picture of me from the DKF cardiology (old, because now I’m much uglier and I don’t work there anymore) and is horrified to learn that I was only a research assistant and technician at the University of Bern.” (Carlos Wotzkow, “Servando González: Archbishop of Mazorra”)
But there is documentary evidence that Wotzkow has inflated his academic credentials. His article “The Environment and Ecology in Cuba”, (updated on MAY 27, 2007) published on the FAEC website, is described as, “Revealing reports on the state of the environment and the ecological policies in Cuba, by the biologist Cuban Carlos Wotzkow, exiled in Switzerland.” http://www.mitosyfraudes.org/Cuba.html. In an article titled “Mental Warm-up” (Part One) published on the same website, Wotzkow describes himself as “Cuban molecular biologist -Exiled in Switzerland” http://www.mitosyfraudes.org/Polit/Mental-1.html
But if you go to the website of the Cardiovascular Research Center at the University of Bern (http://www.cvrc.dkf.unibe.ch/content/archive/carlos_wotzkow/index_eng.html, and click on the VIEW menu, and then select SOURCE, will check that the web page on which it appears information about Wotzkow was created on July 22 2006,(<meta name=”DC.Title.Alt” content=”Carlos Wotzkow” /> <meta name=”DC.Date” content=”2006/07/22″ />). However, in “Good wine is called bread and worst of the crumbs, wine”, an article he wrote much earlier, in January 2001, Wotzkow qualified himself On two occasions as a biologist:
“The socialist literature generated is surprisingly good by Habermas, but I consider myself a liberal biologist more closely linked to the European Rawls,” and “I have written of almost everything that interests me and now, without knowing its usefulness (and liberal biologists should be utilitarian at all times).”
From the above it can be inferred that, in 2001, Wotzkow was a biologist in the Department of Molecular Biology of the University in Bern, and in 2006 it had been demoted to the position of Research Assistant Technician at the Cardiovascular Research Center of the University of Buenos Aires, university, or Wotzkow’s qualification as a biologist molecular is nothing more than a fantasy.
On the other hand, in another article, Wotzkow himself confirms who is not a biologist:
“The University of Havana, for example, allowed my admission to postgraduate courses (systematics and ecology) without me being a biologist graduated from the university.”, (“Carlos Wotzkow and his experience in Cuba.” Interview (summarized) with Eduardo Prida, former official of the Bureau of Scientific Research of the DAAFAR, by Carlos Wotzkow).
But let us return to the subject of the accusation made against me of the alleged crime of having adulterated a photo of Wotzkow that appeared on my website. As in any case where a criminal fact, the first question an investigator asks himself it is cui bono; a Latin term that means Who benefits?
The possible suspects of having committed that criminal act it’s me, some enemy of Wotzkow, and Wotzkow himself.
But we must not forget that it was I who used the photo as a key document to prove that Wotzkow lies in relation to to their academic qualification. Adulteration the photo, destroying the value of the evidence, would be equivalent to to destroy my own credibility. Therefore, the possibilities that it was me who altered the photo are remote.
One of the many could have done it too. enemies that Wotzkow has earned in so many years of writing articles in which he insults his adversaries. But, apart from that, of the fact that the effort far outweighs the benefits, That possibility is also remote.
So the only suspect we have left is his own Wotzkow. In fact, the only person who profits by destroying my credibility is Carlos Wotzkow. If, as I am charged, The photo had been altered by me, that would prove that I am not a reliable source. Consequently, all that I’ve written about Wotzkow, and about Castroism and its allies, and agents, would be worthless.
Therefore, the only thing that makes sense is that Wotzkow managed to sneak into my website, changed the photo for a few hours, created the problem, reported it, and then put the original photo back in its place.
If anyone doubts that it is relatively easy to enter a website and change information within it, I provide you with some links so you can check out how easy it is which results:
<http://www.2600.com/hacked_pages/>
<http://www.g4tv.com/techtvvault/features/3418/Hack_This_Site_pg2.html?detectflash=false> <http://www.unknowncountry.com/news/?id=515>
As additional information, I will tell you that a few years ago Years ago a hacker snuck into the CIA website and placed dozens of photos in which he caricatured the Agency.
Needless to say, the CIA site has been Designed by professionals, it is monitored 24 hours a day of the day by the most qualified technicians, is hosted on the most powerful servers, and protected with all the necessary barriers (fire walls) to that this does not happen. On the contrary, my website is a site in which I do not carry out commercial transactions, and that it has only the most primitive barriers of security.
Moreover, in the investigation into the fact made by Elías Seife, the webmaster of Guaracabuya, he discovered that, although the original page where occurred the alteration had been created with Adobe PageMill, photo replacements had not been made with that program.
For those interested in the technical details, I will elaborate that Adobe PageMill is an old program that Adobe left of selling, and totally abandoned, more than seven years ago, years. I still use it because I master it, it allows me to do what I need, and, fundamentally, because I don’t want to learn a new one. But, to use PageMill, it doesn’t work with the system X of the current Macs, I have to use a G3 Mac with system 8.6. In computational terms, it is a computer of the Stone Age. And I doubt that at this point there are many people who are still using Adobe PageMill to create pages web.
So, if I didn’t alter the image I, nor any of Wotzkow’s enemies, the only thing that it is possible that Wotzkow himself made it. But, on the other hand, I don’t think Wotzkow has the necessary know-how to do such work. However, since Wotzkow is the The only person who benefits from the alteration and substitution of the photo, we must reach the conclusion that this was carried out by friends of Wotzkow. Friends who, On second thought, they may be even more interested than Wotzkow himself in undermining the credibility of my work.
Wotzkow the censor
If we refer to the e-mails that Wotzkow sent me earlier and after I published my article about the book de Behe, it is evident that he was trying to avoid at all costs to publish it. For this he first resorted to the advice “Twice you announced to me that you were about to attack the Darwinism with I don’t know what political conspiracies. Twice I recommended you, as your friend, to turn the cannons against global environmentalism.”, “But anyway, my advice now would be to do “delete” to that crazy article you have written”, and then to the threat, “The e-mail I am enclosing is part of my records newspapers, because everything is recorded in case the memo is needed later. In it you’ll see that he didn’t want you to jump against something I respect.”
And, as you saw earlier, this is not the first time that Wotzkow He has tried to censor me. Remember that with his fallacious argument that, “I would not write against a dead man, what I didn’t have the courage to tell him in life,” he took the side of two of his supposed enemies, Carlos Estefanía and Elizabeth Burgos, when they censored my article “The Jesús Díaz’s strange encounter with death”.
But, as we will see later, this is not the first Time, in their eagerness to censor harmful information for Castroism, Wotzkow allies himself with the enemies that he claims to fight.
A few years ago Juan Vivés (pseudonym of Andrés Alfaya, a former Castro intelligence officer exiled in France), brought to light a piece of information extremely harmful to Castroism. According to Alfaya, his uncle, former Cuban president Osvaldo Dorticós, he had told him that Salvador Allende had not suicide, but that Patricio de la Guardia had murdered him following Castro’s orders.
I was not particularly surprised by the news, for it only confirmed a rumor I heard in Cuba many years ago. Also, remember that both of you, Beatriz and Laura, Allende’s daughter and sister, “committed suicide” in Cuba in strange circumstances.
As you can imagine, this information is extremely harmful to Castro. If this is proven, the leftists, pro-Castro socialists and communists from all over the world would have than to put your head in a bucket.
Therefore, in order to counteract it, immediately the agent of Castro influence Raúl Rivero, who alleges that he knew Alfaya, he downplayed the value of information. According to Rivero, Alfaya is a native of his same town in Camagüey, it never belonged to Castro’s intelligence, it was not family of Dorticós, and is nothing more than an inventor of fantasies.
But, let’s see who joins Rivero in his campaign to discredit Alfaya.
“Carlos Wotzkow” <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: About Juan Vives
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:32:12 +0200Dear friends, this e-mail is strictly private.
Yesterday I received a call from a friend in Madrid to tell me that he was at Raúl Rivero’s house (this it was before the Miami Book Fair) when Juan Vives he called him on the phone. In the words of this friend, Rivero later recounted, and in the state of of arrogant euphoria, than Vives, who is actually called Andrés Aphaya had begged him to accept a non-aggression pact verbal and public because — in Rivero’s words — “he He knows well that I do know him and I know that everything he tells it’s a lie.”
In an article published in Encuentro en la Red, Juan Vives seems to have fulfilled the pact and calls Rivero “my friend”, but then, it seems that Rivero uncovered himself talking bad about him (I don’t have the texts) in order to meet Ileana de la Guardia (her true friend in France), and with his future friends of influence in Cuba. Vives counters him in a text entitled The False Prophets, it is a lousy text, which copies the style of other texts equally titled and that brings to light the tell me what I will tell you of this riffraff.
Apparently, this Vives is illiterate and only dedicated himself to in Cuba to be carried and brought and to snitch because he was a relative of a senior Castro official (I’m not sure it’s really the nephew of Osvaldo Dorticós) if not for the crude action of calling an enemy on the phone in this first world potential and thus give to a puppet like Rivero. The detail already leaves a lot to say about that super-agent who gives them everything for a while. I repeat, read the texts of Servando.
A hug and I appreciate all kinds of feedback about the character.
Carlos
The above are not isolated cases. For example, in an article entitled “Opinions to Read”, Wotzkow he contrasts Montaner with Armengol:
“Carlos Alberto Montaner believes, in principle, that the only thing what is needed is to wait for the death of Fidel Castro to begin to see the political changes within the island.” . . . “Alejandro Armengol knows that the dictatorship in Cuba will remain untouchable for years, even though after the death of the tyrant.” . . . “Carlos Alberto Montaner believes in economic and political strength and the morality of the Cuban exile.” . . . “Alejandro Armengol he knows, because he sees it and touches it on a daily basis of Miami, that the number of Cubans with money interested in in returning to Cuba it will not exceed 3%. That generations who have arrived in the U.S. after 1989 are more pro-Castro than those who have stayed in Cuba, and that the The moral arsenal of exile languishes with that generation beaten, insulted and demoralized by a patriotic apathy incurable.”
And with whom does Wotzkow ally himself in this diversity? of criteria? Of course, with the defeatist Armengol, one of the the agents of influence of Castro that he criticizes so much.
“That is why I believe that Carlos Alberto Montaner, despite to be a convinced agnostic, is a fervent and lost believer.” [Note: Wotzkow is already about to accuse Montaner as a religious fundamentalist.] “That’s why I say that Armengol is not wrong (even if it bursts my liver). Armengol knows the clay he molds.”
Wotzkow the Castro agent
A key concept in the intelligence and espionage profession is that of “tradecraft”, a difficult term of translating into Spanish, but which essentially refers to to the operational routines — the modus operandi — that characterize to each intelligence service in particular. The specialists in counterintelligence they affirm that it is enough just to observe for a few hours the way an agent or officer acts to determine whether it belongs to the Mossad, the KGB, the CIA, MI6, the DGI, or another intelligence service
Castro’s intelligence services have been extremely efficient in penetrating and compromising anti-Castro organizations in exile. This is essentially because, contrary to the fact that, contrary to to the Castroites, the anti-Castroites do not have a country, neither armed forces, nor intelligence services that protect our interests. On the contrary, we are the minuscule appendage of a country controlled by the same forces that put Castro in power more than 60 years ago and they’ve kept it there ever since. But, despite the fact that With all its power and ability, Castro’s intelligence has been incapable of to hide the tradecraft of its agents.
The most important features of tradecraft of the agents that Castro’s intelligence services have Infiltrated among the ranks of the anti-Castro exile are:
- 1. Everyone shows a visceral hatred against Fidel Castro,
- 2. This visceral hatred is not due to the fact that Castro is a bloodthirsty tyrant, but because he is a communist,
- 3. According to them, Castro came to power with aid from the communists, and remains an agent at the service of the of Moscow and international communism,
- 4. They never criticize the traditional exile,
- 5. They approach figures of traditional exile and feed their egos,
- 6. They are friendly, pleasant, and prototypes of the “cubanazo”,
- 7. Some of them, such as Juan Pablo Roque and René Gonzalez, they’re aviation pilots — a skill very useful in the event that you have to leave hastily the country in which they operate to go to take refuge 90 miles away.
In the case of Carlos Wotzkow, I could add some characteristics, evidenced in the articles in those who attack me, which point directly towards Havana: In Cuba, Castro has systematically accused his opponents of the insane (they are interned in Mazorra and in other psychiatric centers), of religious fanatics, and of homosexuals. You don’t have to forget that the UMAPS were not only concentration camps to confine homosexuals, but also non-homosexuals accused of homosexuals for opposing Castroism, and minorities religious women who opposed the regime, such as Jehovah’s Witnesses.
The only epithets that Wotzkow has so far not has used against me are “lumpen”, “scum”, and “worm”, but, as a faithful imitator of his Maximus Leader in Cuba, I wouldn’t be surprised if he did at any time.
Panic in the DGI?
The second article Wotzkow writes against me, “Servando González: Archbishop of Mazorra”, reaches an extraordinary level of aggressiveness and vituperation. And here one wonders, even if all that Wotzkow says about If I were true — which is not –, Who could to think that I am a worse person than Fidel Castro or his brother Raul? However, a simple glance at the multiples articles in which Wotzkow mentions the tyrant and his brother, shows that none of these reach the level of aggression and reproach expressed in the articles in which he attacks me, in particular the second. Therefore, there must be something in What sparked that scorched earth war against me on the part of Wotzkow and his mentors, to the point that made them make two serious mistakes.
At the end of my article “Evolution in the Revolution,” I use the example of how bull runners in Pamplona they use a rolled newspaper to throw the bull on a red herring, and then I clarify that,
“What I want to highlight with my metaphor of the newspaper it is that, in the same way that the conspirators invented the Soviet communism and kept it alive artificially until it collapsed (see the professor’s books Antony Sutton Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution and National Suicide: Military Aid to the Soviet Union) and then they created Nazi Germany (read Sutton Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler himself), destroy newspapers ideological does not solve anything if we do not put an end to the source. If communism disappeared from the planet tomorrow and fascism, the conspirators would create out of nothing other similar ideologies. In fact, we have already seen that, according to the SRI document, they plan to convert humanity to Gnosticism.”
“For many years the anti-Castro Cubans of the exile — and I must clarify once again that I am referring to the real ones, not the Castro agents infiltrated in the exile — , blinded by the anti-communist meme, have not wanted to to see who their real enemies are. This has been a serious mistake for which we have paid by losing all the battles against Castro. Fortunately, according to what I’ve read lately in the press and in the pages of Guaracabuya and other websites, more and more Cubans are discovering who their real enemies are and have been all these years.”
In other words, what I propose is a change of strategy in the struggle against Castroism.
According to my theory, the powerful forces that put Castro in power, and that he has been promoted and protected by all these years, they have never been in the Kremlin, but in Wall Street.
Of course, although based on abundant evidence, this it is nothing more than a theory. What’s more, my Suggestion on what the new strategy should be is not the most appropriate. But what no one would dare is that the strategy used for almost half a year The struggle against Castro has been effective. The test of What it hasn’t been is the fact that we’re still here in exile, while Castro remains in Cuba. But who is the person who directly benefits from Cubans anti-Castro exiles continue to employ an ineffective strategy in his fight against Castroism? Obviously, the only beneficiary it is Fidel Castro.
Intelligence officers are therefore likely to Castro regime that closely monitors Guaracabuya have concerned about the threat posed by my theory, and decided to neutralize me intellectually and morally in order to avoid that more Cubans discover who their real ones are Enemies. But, as I said earlier, in his desperation They made two serious mistakes.
Two mistakes
The first mistake:
In his article “Servando González: Archbishop of Mazorra”, Wotzkow states that,
“It is striking that the answer that Servando dedicates to me has been distributed in PDF format for webmasters to see forced to mount it along with a photo of me taken from the University of Bern and where he electronically deforms my face until it made me look scary.”
But that accusation, like all those that I gratuitously Wotzkow does, it does not conform to the truth. To the only publication to which I have systematically sent my contributions in the past five years it is Guaracabuya. Since Guaracabuya does not publish photos or illustrations, I always send you my Collaborations in . RTF (Rich Text Format), a format created by Microsoft that ensures that documents created in Different types of Word processing software retain their formatting original and do not lose the diacritics (accents, accents, umlaut, etc.). Elías Seife, the webmaster of Guaracabuya, can confirm that this was the type of format I used to send you the two parts of my article “Evolution in the Revolution?”
I, who own my website, don’t check every day each of the ninety or more pages that compose it. Therefore, since I do not believe that Wotzkow will not do it either, he has to having been someone who closely monitors my website (probably the same person who altered the photo) who warned him Wotzkow of the existence of the altered photo. It is likely that Wotzkow has created a .PDF document (Portable Document Format, a type of document created by Adobe, which allows a reproduction facsimile type of a graphic document, including colors and with photos and drawings), or someone has created it for him, to show it as proof that your photo on my website had been adulterated.
Even though I asked him several times for a long time telephone conversation that we had, the editors of Guaracabuya refused to tell me who had given them sent the original .PDF document in which the doctored photo, claiming that it was not important. But, on the contrary, as I have shown above, the fact it is extremely important. It’s actually a key fact to understand How this photo problem started, inflated artificially out of all proportion.
However, thanks to the Freudian slip committed by Wotzkow, in which he mentions the existence of a document .PDF which I do not I believed, I have great suspicions about who that was person.
The second mistake:
In the same article, Wotzkow states that,
“Jesús Díaz once explained to me by phone the reasons why he did not accept the texts of Servando, who insistently begged him to publish something. Upon Díaz’s death, Servando took revenge for the offense with the dead man, accusing him of all the things that in life he didn’t have the balls to tell him. In an e-mail from May 2002 Servando He asked me my opinion on his article against Jesús Díaz and my response was clear: ‘I would not write against a dead man, which I didn’t have the courage to tell him in life.'”
But, I don’t think this fits the truth.
In the first place, although Wotzkow does not give a precise date, refers to several friendly conversations, logically this had to be before Díaz’s death. But, before from my article on the strange death of Jesus Díaz, my name and those of the director of Encuentro are not related in any way. On the other hand, I imagine that in the years that he was director of Encuentro, Jesús Díaz has received hundreds of manuscripts that he decided Do not publish. Therefore, the possibility that my name has come to light in a conversation between Jesus Díaz and Carlos Wotzkow is such a remote coincidence that it does not even deserve to be considered.
Secondly, because, knowing Wotzkow and the way in which he that operates, if in May 2002 Wotzkow had known that I had had sent an article to Jesús Díaz, which he had rejected for whatever reasons, in that moment I would have wielded that argument to destroy my credibility, and he wouldn’t have just made the stupid comment about not speaking ill of the dead. But he didn’t. And he didn’t, for the simple reason that he did not know.
Therefore, based only on logical deductions Based on the evidence, I will give my version of the facts:
Articles such as “The Strange Encounter of Jesus Díaz with death”, and “Evolution in the revolution?” are the kind of work that the DGI officials who control Wotzkow do not want it to Cubans in exile read, much less those on the island. By therefore, they set about the task of finding something that could be imputed to me to discredit me. To this end, they mobilized their numerous agents abroad, including Annabelle Rodriguez — the daughter of Carlos Rafael Rodríguez who shamelessly he directs Encuentro. After hours of searching In the electronic files of the deceased, they found the e-mail which I sent to Díaz in which I attached him to An article on the crisis of the rockets of 1962. Annabelle sent it to her controllers in Havana, and they in turn passed the information to him to Wotzkow.
Repito, no poseo evidencia documental que pruebe esta teoría. Por consiguiente, si alguien tiene elementos de juicio que provean una explicación mejor, le ruego la dé a conocer.
Guaracabuya en peligro
Se podría objetar que si, tal como asevero, Carlos Wotzkow es un agente secreto de los servicios de inteligencia castrista, ¿cómo se explica que se haya dedicado sistemáticamente a atacar a personas de las cuales se sospecha que sean agentes de influencia del castrismo?
La respuesta a esa interrogante está en los propios artículos de Wotzkow. Un análisis cuidadoso de sus ataques a estas personas revela que, debido a su característica de ataques personales, carecen de efectividad. Esto ya lo notó una lectora de su libro Natumaleza cubana. En una reseña publicada en Amazon.com el 2 de octubre de 1999, Niurka Calero Alayón expresó:
“The purpose of the book is excellent in the sense that takes stand as a critic of the policy of the Cuban goverment related to biology and conservation, but it does this based on personal arguments with other biologists. This generates controversy among readers which defeats at the end the objective of the book.”
Además, cuando la importancia del asunto lo requiere — como en el caso de desprestigiar una fuente que ha publicado algo dañino para el castrismo–, Wotzkow se suma a los agentes de influencia castrista que dice combatir. Estos son lo casos en que se alió con Estefanía en contra mía por mi artículo sobre Jesús Díaz, con Raúl Rivero en contra de Alfaya por lo de su artículo sobre el asesinato de Allende, y con Armengol en contra de Montaner.
Wotzkow ha actuado en esta forma porque, a diferencia de esas otras personas, que fueron enviadas a varios países para infiltrarse en publicaciones liberales o procastristas encubiertas, la tarea de Carlos Wotzkow era mucho más delicada e importante, por eso había que cimentar cuidadosamente su bona fides de anticastrocomunista furibundo entre los grupos genuinamente anticastristas del exilio. La tarea de Wotzkow consistía en infiltrase en el órgano del exilio que más daño le estaba haciendo al castrismo. La publicación que, a pesar de sus esfuerzos, hasta ahora la DGI no había podido penetrar: la revista electrónica Guaracabuya, órgano de la Sociedad Económica de Amigos del País.
Wotzkow himself confirms this when, perhaps acting as a spokesman, of his masters in Havana, admits that:
” Guaracabuya, of the Economic Society of Friends of the Country. That website, run by very brave Cubans of the Authentic Organization, is the most feared of the MININT. (Carlos Wotzkow, “Oferta Castro’s henchmen.”)
A few years ago Wozkow visited Miami, and met personally to Miguel Uría. Then Uría introduced him to him in turn several key figures of the historical exile, with whom Wotzkow met on several occasions. What he ignores that group of Cubans in historical exile is that, before of knowing them, Wotzkow had carefully studied the files of each of them, and only put to their lips the words they wanted to hear. That is why he was able to manipulate their egos so easily.
It is interesting to discover that Wotzkow fits the profile of the type of Castro agent who has successfully penetrated to historical exile. In an article on Wotzkow, someone describes it as “a Cuban”. That means, funny, foul-mouthed, and given to speculation and gossip.
From the moment they read my article on Jesus Díaz and Encuentro, Carlos Wotzkow and his mentors They realized how dangerous I was for their plans of ideological penetration of exile. How it is for them impossible to refute my articles with evidence, from that moment they’ve been trying to censor them. They have finally succeeded, although not totally, because there is still freedom of expression on the Internet.
That is why Wotzkow was so bothered by the simple fact that that I would have created my own website:
“But the crazy intelligence analyst told me a few years ago. two weeks how happy I was to be able to have my own place. Why did the crazy woman have to open a place of her own? mimetics and semiologist of LA? I’m afraid it was because every day it was more difficult for me to someone will publish the mental straws to which we are accustomed. And because in addition to being crazy and rapturous, now she shows us as an incurable egocentric.” (Carlos Wotzkow, “Servando González: Archbishop of Mazorra.”)
Although I consider myself a qualified intelligence analyst, I that I learned by myself, I have never worked, nor have I been in any way related to an intelligence service, since be it the Mossad, the CIA, MI6, the KGB, or the DGI. My knowledge intelligence, counterintelligence, and espionage are theoretical, not practical. Like I’ve never been trained by a service I know the techniques in theory, But I don’t have what’s called “operational experience.” This explains why I fell into the traps that I was forced to fall into. Wotzkow pretended to befriend me.
However, this also proves that I have no training operational in espionage techniques. A trained agent he would not have treated Wotzkow in cordial terms in which I did. A trained agent would have created, as Wozkow is accustomed to do, a personal file on each one of the individuals with whom he maintains friendly relations.
For all that I have stated above, we must arrive at the sad conclusion that the objective that intelligence Castro’s Leader had been persecuting for many has become in a reality: Guaracabuya has been penetrated by the Castro intelligence services. Therefore, until the necessary measures are not taken to eliminate this penetration, Guaracabuya is not a reliable means of information, and the articles published therein, especially by people suspected of being agents of Castroism, they must be read very carefully.
En particular me refiero a artículos como “¿Cómo acabar con Castro?” y “Oferta pública a los esbirros de Castro”, de Carlos Wotzkow. En el primer artículo Wotzkow define lo que llama un “Manual para un cubano clandestino y exitoso.”, en el que enumera 10 puntos para empezar esta lucha clandestina contra el régimen.
Según el propio Wotzkow,
“Desde su publicación el 5 de Noviembre del 2005, 321 récords (en 4 provincias) de la policía política hacen mención del mencionado “manual”. Unas 1,622 acciones de desobediencia civil ocurridas después de la fecha mencionada “pudieran” estar vinculadas al mismo.” (Carlos Wotzkow, MININT: ¿100% confiable?)
Pero, como no es posible verificar que esta información que suministra Wotzkow sobre le efectividad de su Manual sea cierta, hay que suponer que, por el sólo hecho de venir de la fuente que proviene, debe ser todo lo contrario.
En otra parte del mismo artículo, Wotzkow pregunta:
“Si la Internet está sumamente controlada. Si los que tienen acceso a la World Wide Web son todos elementos de “confianza” para el sistema. ¿Cómo es posible que un documento elaborado recientemente en el exilio haya llegado tan rápido al pueblo? “
Como Wotzkow no ofrece una respuesta, yo voy a dar la mía: tal vez algunos de los puntos del Manual de Wotzkow sean convenientes para el castrismo. Por consiguiente, la seguridad castrista se está encargando de divulgarlo rápidamente entre el pueblo cubano.
Desafortunadamente, algunos aspirantes a la lucha clandestina contra el régimen castrista han caído en la trampa. Esto se infiere de este artículo de Wotzkow,
“Carlos Wotzkow es el autor del ‘Manual para acabar con Castro’ (ampliamente difundido en Cuba y en el exilio) y cuyos efectos en ciertos sectores de la economía cubana ya se han hecho notar. (<http://www.amigospais-guaracabuya.org/oagcw160.php>). Hasta la fecha, Wotzkow ha recibido 232 mensajes anónimos no solicitados desde Cuba y otros 41 no anónimos a los que ha sugerido cero protagonismo y la más férrea clandestinidad.” (Carlos Wotzkow, “Oswaldo Payá: la marioneta premiada de Fidel Castro.”)
En el segundo artículo, Wotzkow informa que,
“Yo, Carlos Wotzkow, ofrezco la suma de 10’000 dólares americanos al agente cubano que me facilite una lista con los más de 82’000 nombres de informantes regulares del MININT. A los que me crean tonto, sólo la aclaración de asegurarles que ya cuento con más de 2’000 nombres comprobables. Mi oferta es estrictamente privada, la pago con dinero de mi bolsillo, no dependo y ni pertenezco a partido político alguno, no me debo a nadie, no la quiero para extorsionar a nadie, sino para facilitar la justicia y no el borrón y cuenta nueva.”
I don’t think any MININT agent is so naïve to accept the offer, and reveal to Wotzkow his identity to collect $10,000. If anyone does, I imagine you’ll see shorten their life considerably.
In “Attention: to the diaspora”, another article published in Guaracabuya on September 16, 2006, that I have already quoted, Carlos Wotzkow expresses quite a detail the reasons why you should not trust no member of the so-called “internal dissidence” in Cuba. But there is a serious problem with this article. Much of it is a faithful transcription of words and concepts that I have heard on several occasions from the mouth of Miguel Uría in telephone conversations. Of In fact, these concepts reflect an important part of the Guaracabuya, which consists of considering all types of of internal dissidence in Cuba as controlled by security Castro.
So, most likely, Wotzkow recorded him to Uría one of their conversations and, as part of his of manipulating the egos of members of the historical exile, he used it as a basis for writing his article. But given the fact that Uría has never protested about size plagiarism, there is also the possibility that the ideas that Uría has repeated to me several times on the phone not be original to him, but to Wotzkow. If this were In this case, it would turn out that one of the key concepts of the editorial policy of Guaracabuya has been created by a person who everything indicates that he is an agent of the services Castro’s intelligence system.
The real motive for the Wotzkow attacks
It is no coincidence that Wotzkow’s attacks on me started shortly after appearing on Google Video the Introduction to the TruthLies series of video programs, which I prepare in collaboration with Xzault Media Group of California. At the end of the Introduction Some of the programs that we will produce in that series are announced. Among them are two that are extremely dangerous for Castro and their Wall Street masters: “Treason in America: The Council on Foreign Relations”, and “The CFR-CIA-Castro Connection”.
The present is a key phase for the survival of Castroism. A carefully crafted plan is now being finalized delineated a few years ago in the secret cabals of the Council on Foreign Relations: the continuation of a sustainable tyranny in Cuba after death of the tyrant. Key elements of this plan are humanization of the figure of Raúl Castro and the creation of a new image of Fidel Castro as an innocent victim of the CIA machinations. The humanization of Raúl It started a while ago. The recent “discoveries” documents proving how the CIA has tried to assassinate Castro on multiple occasions (but, conveniently, he never succeeded), are part of this plan.
The U.S. trade embargo was never aimed at contribute to the fall of the Castro regime. By on the contrary, it provided Castro with the necessary excuse to justify the total failure of Castroism in the economic sphere, political and social. But, with the imminent death of Castro, the embargo becomes an obstacle to the Raulism. Therefore, another important element of this plan is the suspension of the trade embargo so that companies U.S. citizens can trade freely with the regime by Raúl Castro.
Como expliqué anteriormente, algunos de mis artículos han sido altamente perjudiciales para los planes castristas de penetración ideológica del exilio anticastrista. Por consiguiente, tiene lógica que, al igual que lo han venido haciendo con Guaracabuya, los servicios de inteligencia castrista ahora monitoreen mi recientemente creado sitio web.
De modo que, a pesar de que la falta de civismo y educación de este falso biólogo son sólo superadas por su falta de hombría e integridad, no creo que su incomprensible reacción ante mi artículo sobre el libro de Behe tenga nada que ver con el darwinismo, la evolución, o antipatía personal. Lo más probable es que la mosca que picó a Carlos Wotzkow haya sido una llamada que recibió desde Cuba.
Como todo análisis de inteligencia y espionaje, las conclusiones de este estudio se basan en conjeturas, por ahora imposibles de verificar, a las que he llegado a partir de evidencia circunstancial en la forma de datos comprobados y del dominio público. Es posible que algún día, después de la vuelta a la normalidad en Cuba, aparezcan las pruebas documentales sobre éste y otros casos similares. Si esto llegara a suceder, aunque sinceramente lo dudo, me imagino que muchos nos vamos a sorprender cuando sepamos de tantos nombres conocidos, tanto en las filas del anti-castrismo como en las del castrismo, que aparentaban ser una cosa y en realidad eran otra muy distinta.
No hay boca que no habló
Poco después de que Guaracabuya publicó mi artículo sobre Behe y la airada respuesta de Wotzkow, un lector de Guaracabuya me envió un e-mail en el que me decía: “Decididamente Guaracabuya es tremendo foro. Tal que da pie para que se ventilen controversias de envergadura.” A lo que le respondí: “Sobre lo que me dices de que Guaracabuya es tremendo foro, coincido contigo. Y eso se ha logrado gracias a Miguel Uría, a quien estimo como amigo y admiro por su gran honestidad intelectual. Creo que Guaracabuya es un buen ejemplo de lo que algún día debemos tener en una Cuba libre.”
Desgraciadamente, como bien dice el dicho “No hay boca que no habló, que Dios no castigó”. Los hechos recientes me han hecho cambiar de opinión. Desgraciadamente ya no creo que Guaracabuya sea el modelo a seguir por una prensa libre en una futura Cuba democrática.
Por ejemplo, en mi conversación telefónica con los editores de Guaracabuya, Miguel Uría se refirió varias veces a las muchas horas que él y Elías Seife habían invertido en hacer el análisis forénsico de lo que había sucedido en mi sitio web. Sin embargo, una breve consulta con un abogado los habría alertado de que ellos mismos habían cometido un delito mucho más grave que el que me imputan, cuando publicaron en Guaracabuya los dos artículos de Carlos Wotzkow en los que se me injuria y calumnia.
Estos artículos caen de lleno dentro la categoría de libelo: un documento en el que se lanzan acusaciones sin base ni pruebas contra una persona, con el sólo propósito de difamar para manchar o destruir su reputación. En uno de los artículos publicado por Guaracabuya y otros sitios web, Wotzkow me hace una velada amenaza de muerte, otro grave delito condenado por las leyes norteamericanas. Más aún, ambos artículos son ejemplos de lo que en este país se conoce como “hate speeech”.
Libel is a felony, severely punishable by law of this country, and to commit it concerns both the writer and the writer of the the article as well as the editors who publish it. Freedom of the press carries with it a responsibility, and an important part of the Work of the editors of a mass media outlet it is to carefully read the articles they publish.
Both of Wotzkow’s libels have been published in Guaracabuya, Cuba in the World, Cuba Libre Digital, CAMCO, and others websites. How do you explain that these websites, which describe themselves as anti-Castro, publish articles by an author who, according to him, he himself affirms in his articles, his main sources they are active officers of the MININT and the DGI, who send them information from government-controlled computers Castro? (See, for example, Elias Seife, “Who Do they have computers in Cuba?, <http://www.amigospais-guaracabuya.org/oages005.php>)
If these websites are the sample of what we will have in a Free and democratic Cuba after the fall of the tyrant, there is no doubt that Castro has not only had success in destroying the ethical and moral fiber of the Cubans in Cuba, but also that of some Cubans in the anti-Castro exile.
But the editors of Guaracabuya went a step further. Not only did they notify me that they were not going to accept any more my collaborations, but also removed from the site of Guaracabuya all my previously published articles. As in the era of communist Stalinism that they say so much hate, in which those defenestrated from the regime were erased of the photographs, for Guaracabuya Servando González he is now the writer who never existed.
In one of his e-mails, Wotzkow asks me to press the “delete” and delete my article about the book of Behe. Finally Wotzkow the censor got his way: the editors of Guaracabuya pressed for him the “delete” key and censored all my articles.
After they checked that the photo of Wotzkow on my website had been altered, but not who I had altered, I received an e-mail from the editors of Guaracabuya in which they informed me that: “This in our minds gives credibility to Wotzkow’s argument and therefore Therefore, we believe that this series of events/transactions is not the one we expect from a collaborator from Guaracabuya.”
But there is something I do not understand. When I started collaborating with Guaracabuya, I remember that in a conversation I had to formally promise him a phone call with Miguel Uría that he would never speak positively about Castroism nor would he defend “dissidence”. I think that even At the moment I have never violated these rules, especially because I agree with them. But, apparently, there was a third inviolable rule that was never communicated to me: that on private websites of the authors of Guaracabuya could not appear, by no means, caricatured photos of Carlos Wotzkow.
Although he had no legal authority to do so, I asked Elías Seife, the webmaster of Guaracabuya, to conduct forensic research on my website to determine how it had been carried out out photo replacement. Then, data-driven incomplete, and perhaps in additional considerations that are not I was informed, the editors of Guaracabuya were erected in judges and issued their sentence. But with what ethical or moral authority the editors of Guaracabuya dared to tell me that “that series of events/transactions is not the that we expect from a collaborator from Guaracabuya“, when they themselves had just published two libels in their pages in which I am attacked, without including a single objective evidence to sustain it, in the lowest and most despicable terms? How is it that the editors of Guaracabuya have dared to judge me for a fault that I did not commit, when they have committed a much more serious one that they cannot deny? Isn’t it the publication of libels Wotzkow’s A Thousand Times Worse Reality Alteration than the one in the photo?
In several of the conversations I had with Miguel Uría In relation to this matter, he told me his purpose to act with total impartiality. However, after to analyze his conduct in relation to this case, I believe that the editors of Guaracabuya have not been totally impartial. In fact, in this dispute they have placed themselves on the side of insults and baseless defamation against the data objectives, reasoned arguments, and ideas.
In April 2005, Pope Benedict XVI expressed harshly against moral relativism, which he described as as the greatest danger facing humanity. The Pope is Right. Moral relativism is the ideology that it cements both communism and fascism. It is the ideology that underlies the ideas of the Darwinists, the Malthusianists, the adherents of the New Age, the humanists, and other ideologies similar totalitarian ones.
Unfortunately, it seems that the editors of Guaracabuya have been contaminated with the moral relativism that the Pope condemns. By censoring my articles, they have shown that, because of their moral relativism, they see the speck in the eye of others, but they are incapable to see the beam in one’s own.
If they want it to survive as an anti-Castro publication independent in exile, from now on the editors of Guaracabuya should include a new inviolable rule for their contributors: Guaracabuya’s employees must not maintain any type of contacts or relationships with members of the security and Castro’s intelligence.
In the course of this controversy, Mr. Carlos Wotzkow has shown a total lack of respect for the institutions and norms that characterize a democratic society. His attitude of a handsome man from the neighborhood, who well remembers courage of the members of the Rapid Action Brigades Castro-fascists, is a good indication of what patterns guide their behavior. The only thing he lacked was was trying to make me eat my items.
In his arrogance, Mr. Wotzkow seems to ignore that, at the same time, he is not the only one who has been able to do so. weigh all their imperfections, acceptable rules of conduct in democratic countries differ from those of the totalitarian countries, and there are laws that must be respected.
In his article “Castro’s propaganda: mode of use”, Wotzkow says that,
“Just two days after my release from Villa Marista, a mulatto who worked for the Security of the State, he told me, in the gloomy 070 office of the airport international José Martí, ‘that if I didn’t behave and did not alert them to the interests of the gringos who They worked with me, they made up the most implausible, made it graphically credible, and they fucked up my life.'”
It seems that Wotzkow was putting the patch on before he the grain came out.
So, the next topic of the next Wotzkow’s article in which he will try to refute accusations, whether to accuse me of being an agent of the Castroist intelligence. But, unlike the present article, where all the evidence I have provided is in the public domain, for I have taken them from Wotzkow’s own articles, Their accusations will be based on their secret sources in the security and Castro’s intelligence.
So please, if anyone has anything against me, that you prove it objectively now, based on verifiable documents that have been published before the beginning of this controversy. It is not going to happen that, by one of those strange coincidences of life, the same “dissident” agent of security who informed Wotzkow of the number of series of Rivero’s pistol, discover now, by pure chance, a folder with documents where it is proven in great detail my participation in the assassination of President Kennedy — or worse.
Lawsuits against the editors of Guaracabuya
For all the foregoing, in my name and in the name of the readers of Guaracabuya, I demand of the editors of Guaracabuya that,
1. Make the facsimile of the initial email public who attached a .pdf document with my article “Evolution in the revolution?” which alerted them to the existence of the altered photo on my website.
2. Explain to the readers of Guaracabuya the reason for which, in spite of my direct questions, they did not want to reveal to me the name of the person who sent them that e-mail.
3. Inform the readers of Guaracabuya if, in their decision to eliminate me as a columnist from Guaracabuya and remove my previous articles from your website, private conversations with Carlos Wotzkow influenced my back.
4. Explain to the readers of Guaracabuya which are the reasons why they publish articles of a person who has publicly admitted to multiple On occasions, in articles that he has published in Guaracabuya itself, that he maintains contacts with members of the intelligence and Castro’s security.
5. Clarify whose concepts are expressed in the article “Attention: to the diaspora”; Miguel Uría or Carlos Wotzkow?
These demands require only a short response. Demand #3 only requires a “yes” or a “no.”
Unlike the editors of Guaracabuya, who in my case were set up as prosecutors and judges, in this case I act as prosecutor, but those who will judge them will be the own readers of Guaracabuya. So please, This time think a little more before giving your answers. The future existence of Guaracabuya as an independent news outlet and tribune depends on their total honesty of the anti-Castro exile.